Lymwave logo
Audit tool

AI Visibility Audit

Audit a public site for crawlability, schema coverage, answer extraction readiness, llms.txt presence, and other AI visibility signals.

Use this audit to surface the technical and structural issues that make it harder for AI search systems, answer engines, and citation workflows to understand your site.

What the tool will surface

A structured audit for the most practical signals that influence how easily your site can be discovered, parsed, and cited by modern answer systems.

Checks crawlability, indexing hints, and sitemap discoverability
Flags missing or weak schema and llms.txt coverage
Highlights answer-extraction and citation-readiness gaps
Outputs clear next actions instead of fake precision
Shared report structure

How Visibility Audit is organized

Each tool page follows the same production-minded pattern: a clear promise, a constrained report structure, and a path into deeper services.

Discoverability

Fetchability, robots, sitemap, and canonical basics.

Structure

Headings, semantics, internal linking, and content extraction signals.

Trust signals

Entity clarity, bylines, references, freshness, and credibility cues.

When to use this tool
Use this audit when you want a fast, credible read on whether your site exposes the root-level and homepage signals that make AI discovery and citation easier. It is most useful as a first-pass diagnosis before deeper implementation work.

Best use cases

You want to benchmark whether your homepage and root files support AI discovery at a basic level.
You need a lightweight audit before prioritizing llms.txt, schema, or homepage rewrites.
You want a non-hype way to explain AI visibility gaps to stakeholders.

What you get for free

High-level score bands
Top issues to fix first
Short actionable recommendations
How it works

How the Visibility Audit works

Each tool keeps the interaction simple on the surface, but the output is organized so teams can act on it quickly and understand what the score actually means.

Step 1

Normalize the site root

The audit resolves the submitted URL to the homepage so it can compare the same baseline across sites.

Step 2

Check discovery surfaces

It inspects robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt, and homepage reachability instead of pretending to crawl the entire site.

Step 3

Translate signals into actions

The output groups the most practical structural and discoverability gaps into a short list of next steps.

Key takeaway
The tools are designed to be useful on their own, but they also create a natural bridge into deeper audits, implementation help, and higher-trust service conversations.
Run the audit

Audit homepage discoverability, structure, and AI-readiness signals

Submit a public site URL to review root-level discoverability files, homepage structure, internal linking, schema presence, and answer-oriented content cues.

This v1 audit is intentionally bounded. It checks the homepage plus root-level files like `robots.txt`, `sitemap.xml`, and `llms.txt` instead of pretending to crawl the entire web presence.

Audit a site

Enter a homepage or domain. The audit normalizes the target to the site root before checking discoverability and structure.

Book an audit review
Results

Site-level visibility snapshot

The report blends homepage structure checks with root-level discoverability files to create a practical AI visibility baseline.

No audit yet

Once you run the audit, this section will show discoverability checks, homepage structure signals, and the most important issues to fix first.

Next step

What to do after Visibility Audit

If the output looks directionally useful, the next step is usually turning the findings into implementation work, content changes, or a sharper audit scope.

Use the findings to scope schema, llms.txt, and homepage improvements.
Map the warnings to an implementation backlog instead of treating them as abstract SEO tasks.
Pair the audit with the citation checker if you want page-level follow-through.
FAQ

Common questions

These pages are designed to rank for practical tool intent while still setting realistic expectations about what a lean v1 can and cannot claim.

Does this tool measure actual LLM market share or citation counts?

No. The v1 audit focuses on practical structural signals that influence whether a page is easier for AI systems to crawl, parse, and quote.

Will it crawl my whole site?

The shared framework is designed for a constrained crawl budget. That keeps response times and infrastructure costs reasonable for a free tool.