Lymwave logo
Sign in
Free tools

Free tools for SEO, AEO, GEO, and AI visibility work

Check whether key pages are crawlable, answer-ready, structured for AI search, and supported by the right discovery files before you invest in a larger content workflow.

Start with a focused audit, citation check, llms.txt review, schema draft, or competitor gap scan. Each tool returns a practical next step you can use immediately.
Audit tool

AI Visibility Audit

Audit a public site for crawlability, schema coverage, answer extraction readiness, llms.txt presence, and other AI visibility signals.

Checks crawlability, indexing hints, and sitemap discoverability
Flags missing or weak schema and llms.txt coverage
Highlights answer-extraction and citation-readiness gaps
Page analysis

LLM Citation Checker

Evaluate whether a public page is structurally clear, quotable, and citation-friendly for LLMs and AI answer systems.

Reviews heading clarity, title quality, and scannability
Flags weak sourcing, vague claims, and thin factual density
Surfaces quote-worthiness and answer extraction issues
Validation tool

llms.txt Checker

Validate whether a site exposes a public llms.txt file, whether it can be parsed correctly, and whether its contents are useful.

Checks whether llms.txt exists and is publicly accessible
Validates basic formatting and parseability
Highlights quality gaps, missing pages, and unclear entries
Generator

JSON-LD Generator

Generate valid JSON-LD for common marketing and content schema types, with safe defaults and clear implementation guidance.

Supports the schema types most relevant to content and marketing teams
Uses dynamic fields and validation guardrails
Includes copy, download, and implementation guidance patterns
Comparison tool

Competitor Citation Gap Tool

Compare your site against competitors across practical AI visibility, trust, schema, and citation-readiness signals.

Compares structural and discoverability signals side by side
Highlights realistic gaps in trust, schema, and content framing
Keeps comparisons constrained so the output stays credible